Puckflow.io

Ivar Stenberg

#41
San Jose Sharks

L · 5'11", 185 lb · 19 years old · Shoots left · Gothenburg, SWE

Drafted 2026 · SJS · round 1 · #2 overall

Last 5 games

DateOppGAPTSTOI
Oct 20@MTL01117:44
Oct 19@TOR00014:27
Oct 17@DET11217:30
Oct 15@NSH00014:01
Oct 13BOS11216:49

Against his position

Points / 60: 2.64 — 101st of 443Goals / 60: 0.75 — 199th of 443Assists / 60: 1.89 — 76th of 443Shots / 60: 5.66 — 252nd of 443Shooting %: 13.3% — 181st of 436Even-strength points / 60: 0.38 — 361st of 443Ice time / game: 15:54 — 170th of 443Points/602.64 101stGoals/600.75 199thAssists/601.89 76thShots/605.66 252ndShooting13.3% 181stEV pts/600.38 361stIce time15:54 170th
This playerAverage forward

Against 443 forwards, on rates per 60 minutes so a shortened season is not read as a worse one.

Role
Hits / 600.75410th
Blocks / 601.50266th
Takeaways / 601.13120th
Giveaways / 602.26143rd
Faceoff win %28.6%302nd
Penalty minutes4241st

Off the radar because these describe a role rather than a quality — a shutdown defenceman blocks more than a power-play specialist, and neither is better for it.

NHL regular season

SeasonGPGAPTSTOI
2026-271025715:54
Career1025715:54

Other competitions

SeasonLeagueGPGAPTS
2025-26SHL43112233
2025-26Champions HL12213
2025-26WJC-2074610
2025-26EHT5235
2024-25J20 Nationell27262753
2024-25Hlinka Gretzky Cup54610
2024-25J18 Region3178
2024-25SHL25123
2024-25WJAC-1957411
2024-25J18 Nationell1156
2024-25WJC-1878513
2023-24J18 Region1852732
2023-24WHC-1777310
2023-24J18 Nationell13181230
2023-24J20 Nationell9358
2022-23U16 Region1292332
2022-23J18 Region1261117
2022-23TV-Pucken7448
2022-23J18 Nationell14358
2022-23U16 SM3123
2021-22U16 Region21112132
2021-22TV-Pucken5011
2021-22U16 SM6516
2020-21U16 Div.133710
2020-21J18 Div.23101
2020-21U16 Div.21235
2019-20U16 Div.16112
2019-20U16 Div.24358
2018-19WSI U127336

Shot maps, expected goals and comparisons against league average at this position are coming to this page. They come from Puckflow’s own model rather than the NHL feed, and an empty chart would be worse than this sentence.